Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
KESAVA REMANAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. initial allegations of marital promise and abuse. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. defense argument regarding the consensual nature of the relationship. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's assessment of the nature of the relationship. (Para 6) |
ORDER
Dated this the 19th day of December, 2025 The petitioner is the sole accused in S.C No. 289 of 2025 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-I, Alappuzha, arising out of Crime No. 1497 of 2024. The offence alleged against the petitioner is under Section
376(2)(n) of the IPC .
2. The prosecution case is that the accused, after promising to marry the defacto complainant, subjected her to sexual abuse during the period from 06.06.2023 to 10.12.2023 and thereafter refused to marry her, and thereby he is alleged to have committed the aforesaid offence.
3. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, even as per the averments in the FI statement, the relationship between the petitioner and the defacto complainant was only a consensual one, and as such the offence under Section 376 (2)(n) IPC is not made out. Therefore, he prayed for quashing all further proceedings against the petitioner.
4. The petiton was strongly opposed by th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
