IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
KESAVA REMANAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
ORDER
Dated this the 19th day of December, 2025 The petitioner is the sole accused in S.C No. 289 of 2025 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-I, Alappuzha, arising out of Crime No. 1497 of 2024. The offence alleged against the petitioner is under Section
376(2)(n) of the IPC .
2. The prosecution case is that the accused, after promising to marry the defacto complainant, subjected her to sexual abuse during the period from 06.06.2023 to 10.12.2023 and thereafter refused to marry her, and thereby he is alleged to have committed the aforesaid offence.
3. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, even as per the averments in the FI statement, the relationship between the petitioner and the defacto complainant was only a consensual one, and as such the offence under Section 376 (2)(n) IPC is not made out. Therefore, he prayed for quashing all further proceedings against the petitioner.
4. The petiton was strongly opposed by the learned Public Prosecutor.
5. Though upon service of notice the de facto complainant entered appearance through a counsel, when the matter was taken up for arguments, there was no representation for her.
6. On a perusal of the FI state
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.