JUDGMENT Devan Ramachandran, J.

Sri.T.N.Manoj – learned counsel for the appellant, argued this matter substantially; but when confronted with the fact that the Original Suit, namely OS No. 18/1989, has been decreed, requested that his client be allowed to withdraw this Appeal, to challenge the decree after obtaining the certified copy from this Court, since the records have been called here.

2. Sri.Sudhi Vasudevan, learned Senior Counsel, instructed by Smt.Shilpa Sathish, appearing for respondent No.1, submitted that, though his client does not stand in the way of this Appeal being allowed to be withdrawn, no specific leave be granted in favour of the appellant, since she can invoke any remedy that may be available to her in law.

3. We find some force in the afore submission of the learned Senior Counsel because, we are only concerned about the claim made by the appellant, under the provisions of Order XXI Rules 96 and 100 of the Code of Civi