IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
V.G.ARUN, J
K.N. BABY – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, FOOD & CIVIL SUPPLIES (B) DEPARTMENT – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 11th day of December, 2025 The petitioners were issued with license for running Authorized Ration Distributorship under the Kerala Rationing Order, 1966 and continue to be licensees under the Kerala Targeted Public Distribution System (Control) Order , 2021 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the KTPDS order’). The petitioners have crossed 70 years and they are aggrieved by Ext.P1 Circular directing the authorities not to renew the FPS licenses, if the licensee has crossed 70 years of age.
2. Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are physically healthy and mentally stable. Being so, the interdiction against renewal of the license period beyond 70 years is irrational and baseless. It is pointed out that voicing this grievance, the petitioners have preferred Exts.P2 to P25 representations.
3. Learned Special Government Pleader submits that Ext.P1 is issued in tune with Rule 39 Clause 3 of the KTPDS order prescribing the maximum age of licensees as 70 years. Having opted to continue as licensees under the KTPDS order, the petitioners cannot now turn around and challenge the age restriction. It is further submitted that, since the KTPDS orde
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.