Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MR. ANIL K.NARENDRAN, MURALEE KRISHNA S., JJ
B.VIJAYAN – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the applicant invoked article 227 to challenge a tribunal order regarding pension reduction. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. supervisory jurisdiction under article 227 is limited to instances of gross legal errors. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 3. the high court found no sufficient ground to question the tribunal's findings. (Para 16 , 17 , 18) |
JUDGMENT
Muralee Krishna, J.
The applicant in O.A. No.1371 of 2018 on the file of the Kerala Administrative Tribunal, Thiruvananthapuram (the ‘Tribunal’, in short) filed this original petition, invoking the supervisory jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India , challenging Ext.P6 order dated 14.08.2019 passed by the Tribunal in that original application. During the pendency of this original petition, the original petitioner died and hence his wife, being the legal representative, is impleaded as additional 2nd petitioner.
2. Going by the original application, the 1st petitioner retired as Deputy Director of Survey, Pathanamthitta, on 31.03.2011. While working as Deputy Director of Survey, Kollam, in pursuance to the instructions from the Director of Survey, the 1st petitioner disposed of a complaint made by on
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
