SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 44

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
MERCY SUJA SANTHOSH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 11503 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.ENOCH DAVID SIMON JOEL, SRI.S.SREEDEV, SRI.RONY JOSE, SHRI.LEO LUKOSE, SHRI.KAROL MATHEWS SEBASTIAN ALENCHERRY, SHRI.DERICK MATHAI SAJI, SHRI.KARAN SCARIA ABRAHAM, SHRI.RINOY INNOCENT, SHRI.AADITHYA S.R.
For the Respondents: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Cancellation of bail without a hearing violates due process under the law.

Headnote:The petitioner, accused in S.T.No.920 of 2024, challenged the order dated 14.11.2025, which was issued without a hearing, that cancelled her bail bond under the Negotiable Instruments Act. The Court found that the cancellation was erroneous due to the trial court's failure to hold sessions on multiple dates, underscoring the importance of a fair hearing. The primary issue related to whether proper legal procedure was followed before issuing the non-bailable warrant. The Court ruled that the cancellation of the bail was unjustified, allowing the petitioner to contest the complaint based on her original bail terms.

Table of Content
1. bail cancellation without proper hearing. (Para 1 , 2)
2. petitioner appeared after stay order. (Para 3)
3. court considers legal merits and procedural errors. (Para 4 , 5)

O R D E R

The petitioner is the accused in S.T.No.920 of 2024 on the file of the Court of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class-I, Alappuzha, ('Trial Court', in short), which has been filed by the 2nd respondent alleging the commission of the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act . The petitioner asserts that she was enlarged on bail on 05.10.2024. She is residing in Ernakulam. She was appearing before the Trial Court regularly. There was no sitting before the Trial Court on three posting dates. Due to the petitioner's physical ailment, she could not appear before the Trial Court on 14.11.2025. Surprisingly, on the said date, the Trial Court as per Annexure A2 order, cancelled the bail bond and issued non-bailable warrant against the petitioner, without affording an opportunity of being heard. Annexure A2 order is illegal and erroneous. Hence, the Crl.M.C.

2. When the Crl.M.C. came up for consideration on

18.12.2025, this Court stayed coercive proceedings against the petitioner, subject to the condition that she appears before the Trial Court on 19.12.2025 and get her plea recorded.

3. Consequent to the said order, as discernible from Annexure A3 proceedings, the petitioner surrendered before the Trial Court and her plea has been recorded. The case now stands posted for evidence of the complainant.

4. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.

5. On consideration of the facts and the materials on record, especially the fact that the petitioner's plea has already been recorded, I am of the definite view that Annexure A2 order cancelling the bail bond of the petitioner, and issuing notice to her sureties is erroneous and unjustifiable. It is to be remembered that there was no sitting before the Trial Court on three consecutive posting dates and, thereafter, the case was posted to 14.11.2025, on which date Annexure A2 order was passed. Moreover, pursuant to the order dated 18.12.2025, the petitioner has appeared before the Trial Court and her plea has been recorded.

In the aforesaid circumstances, I allow the Crl.M.C.

by setting aside Annexure A2 order and permitting the petitioner to contest the complaint on the basis of the original bail bond executed by her and the sureties at the time the petitioner was enlarged on bail.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top