Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
N.NAGARESH, J
LEKSHMI CHANDRAN G. – Appellant
Versus
KERALA STATE HOUSING BOARD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks appointment by transfer as senior programmer based on qualification. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. court examines the method of selection and qualification criteria for appointment. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. court's reasoning on qualification and absence of required prior experience. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. court orders the appointment of the petitioner as senior programmer. (Para 12) |
J U D G M E N T
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
The petitioner, who is working as Assistant Grade-I under the 1st respondent-Kerala State Housing Board, seeks to quash Ext.P9 and to declare that she is eligible and entitled for appointment by transfer as Senior Programmer under the 1st respondent-Board.
2. The petitioner states that she joined service under the Kerala State Housing Board as Assistant Grade-II on 21.04.2022 on the basis of PSC advice. Her probation was declared with effect from 29.04.2024. She was promoted as Assistant Grade-I as per order dated
30.09.2024.
3. The petitioner states that appointment to the post of Senior Programmer is governed by Ext.P4 – Kerala State Housing Board Establishment (Qualification and Method of Appointment) Regulations 2022. As per Ext.P4 Regulations, the pos
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
