Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
T.R.RAVI, J
PROF. (DR.) J. SUNDARESAN PILLAI – Appellant
Versus
DR. K.K. SEETHALAKSHMI – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's claims regarding false allegations and jurisdiction. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. conflict of interest and complaints about workplace harassment. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. counteraffidavit and procedural arguments regarding jurisdiction. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. upholding of the internal complaints committee's constitution. (Para 8 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. court's dismissal of the writ petition. (Para 9) |
JUDGMENT
The petitioner retired from CSIR, New Delhi, as a Senior Scientist. Thereafter, he was appointed as Director of the Integrated Rural Technology Centre (IRTC). The petitioner claims to have been associated with IRTC from its inception in 1987. He also claims that the IRTC achieved financial self- sufficiency in 2022-2023 and sought research affiliations with the University of Calicut. He is aggrieved by Ext.P1 notice issued by the 1st respondent in her capacity as the Presiding Officer of the Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) directing him to appear before her on 22.02.2025. According to the petitioner, he was targeted with false allegations to tarnish his reputation since he had raised concerns about the misuse of Government accreditation in waste management, resulting in financ
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
