SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 89

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
K. BABU, J
DR DEEPAK NAIR M.V. – Appellant
Versus
SASIREKHA – Respondent
RPFC No.150 of 2023



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.JOHNSON ABRAHAM, SHRI.NELSON ABRAHAM, SHRI.EMIL JOHNSON
For the Respondents: SMT.VALSAMMA KURIAN JOSE

The court affirms that agreements reached through mediation are legally binding and appropriately recorded in the judgment.

Headnote:In this case of RPFC No.150 of 2023, the High Court of Kerala addressed the mediation outcome where parties mutually settled their disputes. The court found the terms lawful and officially recorded the agreement, leading to disposal of the revision petition. Key issues include adherence to the mediation process and stating that the agreement reached is binding and lawful.

O R D E R

As per the order dated 05.08.2025, the parties were referred to mediation. A report has been submitted by the Mediator, High Court Mediation Centre, Ernakulam, stating that the matter has been settled. The memorandum of agreement is appended to the report. It is stated in the memorandum that the disputes between the parties have been amicably settled. The terms arrived at between the parties are lawful.

Hence, this Revision Petition is disposed of, recording the aforementioned agreement entered into between the parties. The memorandum of agreement shall form part of this judgment.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top