Back
Next 
2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 89
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
K. BABU, J
DR DEEPAK NAIR M.V. – Appellant
Versus
SASIREKHA – Respondent
RPFC No.150 of 2023
Important Points
The court affirms that agreements reached through mediation are legally binding and appropriately recorded in the judgment.
Subject
Family Law - Mediation
Headnote
In this case of RPFC No.150 of 2023, the High Court of Kerala addressed the mediation outcome where parties mutually settled their disputes. The court found the terms lawful and officially recorded the agreement, leading to disposal of the revision petition. Key issues include adherence to the mediation process and stating that the agreement reached is binding and lawful.
Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.JOHNSON ABRAHAM, SHRI.NELSON ABRAHAM, SHRI.EMIL JOHNSON
For the Respondents: SMT.VALSAMMA KURIAN JOSE
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.JOHNSON ABRAHAM, SHRI.NELSON ABRAHAM, SHRI.EMIL JOHNSON
For the Respondents: SMT.VALSAMMA KURIAN JOSE
O R D E R
As per the order dated 05.08.2025, the parties were referred to mediation. A report has been submitted by the Mediator, High Court Mediation Centre, Ernakulam, stating that the matter has been settled. The memorandum of agreement is appended to the report. It is stated in the memorandum that the disputes between the parties have been amicably settled. The terms arrived at between the parties are lawful.
Hence, this Revision Petition is disposed of, recording the aforementioned agreement entered into between the parties. The memorandum of agreement shall form part of this judgment.
