IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
MARI R. – Appellant
Versus
THE CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The petitioner challenges Exts.P8 and P9 orders passed by the Central Information Commission rejecting the appeal preferred by the petitioner herein. The petitioner had sought the following information through an application dated 25.05.2023:
“The Appellant filed an RTI application dated 25.05.2023 (online) seeking the following information:
"I am the accused in FIR No 34 of 2020 of Thiruvananthapuram Railway Police Station and in order to produce before the jurisdictional magistrate court namely Chief Judicial Magistrate Court Thiruvananthapuram in CC No 81 of
2020 and the following information is applied under the RTI Act 2005.
1) Total number of CCTV cameras installed in platform no. 1 of Thiruvananthapuram Central Railway Station on 22-03-2020 and technical specification of the CCTV cameras installed in platform no.1.
2) Name and designation of the officer in charge of operation of CCTV Cameras installed in platform no.1 of Thiruvananthapuram Central Railway Station on
22-03-2020 between 12 Hrs and 13 Hrs.
3) Name and designation of the officer in charge of the server in which data/images from CCTV Cameras installed in platform no.1 of Thiruvananthapuram Centrał Railway Stati
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.