Back
Next 
2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 96
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P. KRISHNA KUMAR, J
G. SASIKUMAR – Appellant
Versus
VIMAL KUMAR – Respondent
OP(C) NO. 785 OF 2016
Important Points
The court dismissed the petition as infructuous based on counsel's submission.
Subject
Civil Law - Civil Procedure
Headnote
The learned counsel contended that the matter has become infructuous as noted by the Court in paragraph 1. The Court observed and ruled that the original petition is dismissed accordingly based on the submitted argument. Final decision rendered: original petition dismissed as infructuous.
Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: G.P.SHINOD
For the Appellants/Petitioners: G.P.SHINOD
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the matter has become infructuous. Accordingly, the original petition is dismissed as infructuous.
