The court dismissed the petition as infructuous based on counsel's submission.

Headnote:The learned counsel contended that the matter has become infructuous as noted by the Court in paragraph 1. The Court observed and ruled that the original petition is dismissed accordingly based on the submitted argument. Final decision rendered: original petition dismissed as infructuous.

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the matter has become infructuous. Accordingly, the original petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 96

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMP. KRISHNA KUMAR, JG. SASIKUMAR – AppellantVersusVIMAL KUMAR – RespondentOP(C) NO. 785 OF 2016

The court dismissed the petition as infructuous based on counsel's submission.

Headnote:The learned counsel contended that the matter has become infructuous as noted by the Court in paragraph 1. The Court observed and ruled that the original petition is dismissed accordingly based on the submitted argument. Final decision rendered: original petition dismissed as infructuous.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P. KRISHNA KUMAR, J
G. SASIKUMAR – Appellant
Versus
VIMAL KUMAR – Respondent
OP(C) NO. 785 OF 2016