Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 100

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P. KRISHNA KUMAR, J
KRISHNAKUMARI – Appellant
Versus
RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI – Respondent
OP(C) NO. 1782 OF 2017

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.P.BIJIMON, SHRI.ABRAHAM JOSEPH, SRI.JACOB SAMUEL
For the Respondents: SMT.BHAVANA VELAYUDHAN, SRI.S.SANAL KUMAR (SR.), SMT.T.J.SEEMA

The court may close a petition if the parties agree that the matter is resolved.

Headnote:In the matter concerning OP

(C) No. 1782 of 2017, the petitioner contended that the issues had been resolved and hence requested to close the petition. The court acknowledged this submission leading to the closure of the original petition. The primary determination by the court notes the closure based on counsel's agreement.

Result: The original petition is closed.

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the matter can be treated as closed. Recording the said submission, the original petition is closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 100

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMP. KRISHNA KUMAR, JKRISHNAKUMARI – AppellantVersusRAMAKRISHNA PILLAI – RespondentOP(C) NO. 1782 OF 2017

The court may close a petition if the parties agree that the matter is resolved.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P. KRISHNA KUMAR, J
KRISHNAKUMARI – Appellant
Versus
RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI – Respondent
OP(C) NO. 1782 OF 2017