Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Dr. A.K.Jayasankaran Nambiar, Jobin Sebastian, JJ
Rayaroth Surendren @ R.Sureshbabu – Appellant
Versus
Parambath Abdul Kareem – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. tenant filed appeal against eviction order. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. tenant's failure to comply with rent payment obligations. (Para 4 , 8) |
| 3. existence of landlord-tenant relationship and rental agreements. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. court upheld appellate authority's dismissal of delay petition. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. revision petition dismissed and tenant granted time to vacate. (Para 11 , 12) |
O R D E R Jobin Sebastian, J.
This Rent Control Revision is filed by the tenant in R.C.P. No. 47/2020 on the file of the Rent Control Court, Thalassery, who is the appellant in R.C.A. No. 90/2025 before the Additional Rent Control Appellate Authority–
III, Thalassery.
2. The aforesaid R.C.P. was filed by the respondent herein, the landlord, under Section 5 for fixation of fair rent and under Sections 11 (2) (b) and 11(3) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965 (hereinafter referred to as “the Rent Control Act”), seeking eviction of the tenant. During the pendency of the Rent Control Petition, the Rent Control Court passed an order under Section 12 (1) of the Act directing the tenant to deposit the admitted arrears of rent and to continue to deposit the rent that may subsequently
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
