SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 199

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C. PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
ADV. SUNDAR SETHURAMAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.DHEERAJ KRISHNAN PEROT, SMT.FIDHA NAVAS, SMT.ARCHITA BAIJU PANICKER, SMT.LIBA L. BENSER, SMT.SONAMOL M.
For the Respondents: SRI.B.ANANTHU PP, SRI.U.JAYAKRISHNAN

O R D E R

(Dated this the 5th day of January, 2026)

The petitioners filed this Crl.M.C praying for quashing Annexure A1 FIR.

2. Now the police, after investigation, filed final report.

Therefore, the learned counsel for the petitioners seek permission to withdraw this Crl.M.C with liberty to challenge the final report.

Accordingly, this Crl.M.C is dismissed with liberty to the petitioners to challenge the final report.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top