SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 204

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
G.GIRISH, J
KUNNOTH BABU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.MANU.M.THOMAS, SRI.P.C.ANIL KUMAR
For the Respondents: SMT.MAYA M.N., PP

ORDER

The petitioners are the accused in C.C.No.448 of 2000 on the files of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Thalassery. They were convicted and sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for three years and fine Rs.10,000/- with a default clause of Simple Imprisonment for nine months for the commission of offence under Section 326 IPC . They were also convicted and sentenced to Simple Imprisonment for six months and one month respectively for the commission of the offences under Sections 323 and 341 . In the appeal preferred before the Sessions Court, Thalassery, the learned Additional Sessions Judge found that the offence under is not made out in the facts and circumstances of the case. Accordingly, the learned Additional Sessions Judge altered the conviction under to one under Section 324 , and awarded a sentence of Rigorous Imprisonment for two years. The conviction and sentence awarded by the Trial Court for the other offences were upheld by the Appellate Court. Aggrieved by the aforesaid verdict of the Appellate Court, the petitioners are here before this Court with this revision.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Public Pr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top