Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
B. RADHAKRISHNAN – Appellant
Versus
THE DIRECTOR GENERAL KERALA FIRE AND RESCUE SERVICES – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's grievance against rejection of fire noc renewal. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. counsel heard for both parties. (Para 3) |
| 3. court finds lack of fair hearing in decision-making. (Para 4) |
JUDGMENT
The above Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:
"i. Issue Writ of Mandamus or any other Writ, Order or Direction, directing the 3rd respondent to reconsider Exhibit.P10 online application submitted by the petitioner for renewal of Exhibit.P2 fire NOC issued by the 1st respondent for the period of years from the date of expiry of Exhibit.P9 issued by the 3rd respondent, within a time frame to be decided by this Hon’ble Court.
ii. Issue a Writ of Certiorari or any other Writ, Order or Direction by quashing Exhibit.P13 order issued by the 3rd respondent after calling for the records leading towards the same from the office of the 3rd respondent."
[SIC]
2. Petitioner is aggrieved by Ext.P13 order of the 3rd respondent rejecting Ext.P10 application for renewal of Ext.P2 fire NOC for the hotel building of the petitioner. According to the petitioner, the reasons mentioned in Ext.P13 are unsustainable, and Ext.P13 is an order passed without giving an opportunity of h
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
