Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 336

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
T.R.RAVI, J
JUSTIN JOHN – Appellant
Versus
SUNIL BABU THOMAS – Respondent
OP(C) NO. 1845 OF 2025

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.P.G.JAYASHANKAR, SMT.PUSHPAVATHI.K, SHRI.S.RAJEEV (K/001711/2019), SMT.SAJANA V.H, SHRI.SHAIJU GEORGE, SMT.SANDRA DAVIS, SMT.BINCY JOSE
For the Respondents: SRI.V.PHILIP MATHEWS, SMT.LAKSHMI S., SMT.SEBA ANNA SIMON, SHRI.ABY SKARIA

The court allows a petitioner to withdraw the petition, dismissing it without delving into substantive issues.

Headnote:The original petition in OP

(C) No. 1845 of 2025 was dismissed as withdrawn at the request of the petitioner. The court acknowledged the withdrawal and granted permission accordingly. No substantial judicial findings were presented as the matter was resolved prior to a hearing.

JUDGMENT

The counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the original petition.

Permission granted and the original petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 336

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMT.R.RAVI, JJUSTIN JOHN – AppellantVersusSUNIL BABU THOMAS – RespondentOP(C) NO. 1845 OF 2025

The court allows a petitioner to withdraw the petition, dismissing it without delving into substantive issues.

Headnote:The original petition in OP(C) No. 1845 of 2025 was dismissed as withdrawn at the request of the petitioner. The court acknowledged the withdrawal and granted permission accordingly. No substantial judicial findings were presented as the matter was resolved prior to a hearing.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
T.R.RAVI, J
JUSTIN JOHN – Appellant
Versus
SUNIL BABU THOMAS – Respondent
OP(C) NO. 1845 OF 2025

Headnote:The original petition in OP

(C) No. 1845 of 2025 was dismissed as withdrawn at the request of the petitioner. The court acknowledged the withdrawal and granted permission accordingly. No substantial judicial findings were presented as the matter was resolved prior to a hearing.