SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 391

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM, J
ANOOP BABU – Appellant
Versus
ANTO THOMAS – Respondent
CON.CASE(C) NO. 2694 OF 2025 | WP(C) NO.28358 OF 2024



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SMT.SANIYA C.V., SMT. AASHI K. SHAJAN
For the Respondents: SRI.PREMCHAND M.

The absence of a lien or debit freeze on the petitioner's account resulted in the closure of the contempt case.

Headnote:This case pertains to a contempt of court application related to WP

(C) No.28358 of 2024, where the petitioner contended the existence of a lien or debit freeze on their bank account. The court found that there was no such lien or freeze, permitting the petitioner to operate the account. The key legal issue considered was whether the contempt application was maintainable given the respondent's submissions. The court concluded that the contempt case was closed based on the lack of any freeze or lien.

Table of Content
1. no lien or debit freeze (Para 1)
2. closure of case (Para 2)

JUDGMENT

1. The learned Standing Counsel for the respondent submitted that there is no lien or debit freeze in the account of the petitioner and the petitioner can operate the account.

2. This Contempt Case is closed recording the said submission.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top