IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A., J
G.SHAJI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner disputes notice for work completion. (Para 1) |
| 2. court considers prior recommendations and potential relief. (Para 2) |
JUDGMENT
The petitioner is aggrieved by Ext.P9 notice issued by the
3rd respondent requiring the petitioner to complete the remaining work within a period of seven days. The case of the petitioner is that, the petitioner was awarded with the work by name “ General Civil work PWD –(Roads) Providing 40 mm graded CC and berm protection to Elamadu -Thevannoor road Ch.0/000 to 6/950” by the 3rd respondent. Ext.P1 is the agreement dated 28.05.2021. According to the petitioner, the substantial portion of the work is already completed and out of 7 Kms, an extent of 750 meters are remaining to be completed. The case of the petitioner is that, the work could not be completed by the petitioner, due to various reasons, not attributable to the petitioner, which include delay in sanctioning revised estimates. Now, as there occurred a huge delay, it is not feasible for the petitioner to complete the work as per the agreed rates.
2. In such circumstances, a representation was submitted by the petitioner highlighting these aspects and acting upon the same,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.