IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, JOBIN SEBASTIAN, JJ
SHINE M – Appellant
Versus
M.MUHAMMED ASHRAF – Respondent
Dr. A.K.Jayasankaran Nambiar, J.
This Rent Control Revision impugns the judgment dated 18.11.2025 of the Rent Control Appellate Authority, Alappuzha, in RCA No.9 of 2025. Although various contentions are raised by the learned counsel for the revision petitioner, we find that the Appellate Authority had confirmed the order of the Rent Controller directing eviction of the petitioner-tenant in terms of Section
11(2)(b) of the Rent Control Act for non-payment of rent.
2. On a perusal of the order of the Appellate Authority, we find that the order of the Rent Controller, as also that of the Appellate Authority, proceeds on the basis that the petitioner-tenant was not able to substantiate his contention that there had been a payment of rent and that the contention regarding non-payment of rent was factually erroneous. Under such circumstances, we find no reason to interfere with the impugned order of the Appellate Authority, and in view of the concurrent findings rendered by the Rent Controller and the Appellate Authority, we dismiss the revision petition.
The learned counsel for the respondent-landlord would submit that in the instant case, the execution petition filed for execution of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.