SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 483

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
GOPINATH P., J
SATHYABHAMA V. – Appellant
Versus
ALATHUR PRIMARY CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 38562 OF 2025



Important Points

The court upheld the procedural allowance for withdrawal of a writ petition upon counsel's request.

Subject

Civil - Writ Petition

Headnote

In this writ petition, the court addressed the application from the petitioner for withdrawal, allowing it as requested. The judgment observes that the petitioner's counsel sought permission to withdraw the application, leading to the dismissal of the petition as withdrawn. The essential legal principle framed is about the authority or permission required for withdraw petitions, evidencing the court's procedural approach in respect to such requests.

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SMT.ANUPAMA SUBRAMANIAN

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application. Accordingly, this writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top