SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 483

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
GOPINATH P., J
SATHYABHAMA V. – Appellant
Versus
ALATHUR PRIMARY CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 38562 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SMT.ANUPAMA SUBRAMANIAN

The court upheld the procedural allowance for withdrawal of a writ petition upon counsel's request.

Headnote:In this writ petition, the court addressed the application from the petitioner for withdrawal, allowing it as requested. The judgment observes that the petitioner's counsel sought permission to withdraw the application, leading to the dismissal of the petition as withdrawn. The essential legal principle framed is about the authority or permission required for withdraw petitions, evidencing the court's procedural approach in respect to such requests.

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application. Accordingly, this writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top