Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 539

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MRS. SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN, J
ABDUL RASAK – Appellant
Versus
RASHID – Respondent
MACA NO. 1066 OF 2015

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.R.SUDHISH, SMT.M.MANJU
For the Respondents: SHRI.P.J.ANTONY JOSEPH MARIADAS, SHRI.R.PADMARAJ

An appeal may be dismissed as withdrawn upon the appellant's request and under appropriate legal provision.

Headnote:The High Court analyzed the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's decision based on the application under relevant laws, where the appellants sought to withdraw their appeal. It noted that the request was in order and thus supported the dismissal of the appeal. The issue was whether the appeal could be withdrawn, leading to the conclusion that the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the appellants seeks permission to withdraw the appeal.

Accrodingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 539

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMMRS. SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN, JABDUL RASAK – AppellantVersusRASHID – RespondentMACA NO. 1066 OF 2015

An appeal may be dismissed as withdrawn upon the appellant's request and under appropriate legal provision.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MRS. SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN, J
ABDUL RASAK – Appellant
Versus
RASHID – Respondent
MACA NO. 1066 OF 2015