SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 544

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C. JAYACHANDRAN, J
BINDU T. – Appellant
Versus
KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.K.SANDESH RAJA

Table of Content
1. writ petition filed under constitutional provision. (Para 1)
2. petitioner requests withdrawal due to defects. (Para 2)

JUDGMENT

This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India .

2. When the writ petition is taken up for consideration today, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition, with the liberty to file a fresh one, due to formal defects.

The liberty sought for is granted. The writ petition accordingly stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh one.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top