SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 544

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C. JAYACHANDRAN, J
BINDU T. – Appellant
Versus
KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 242 OF 2026



Important Points

Petitioner allowed to withdraw writ petition with liberty to file a fresh petition.

Subject

Civil - Writ Petition

Act Referred

Headnote

This writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner sought to withdraw the petition due to formal defects, with liberty to file a fresh petition. The court granted the request, resulting in the petition being dismissed as withdrawn but allowing for a new filing. The court concluded that the dismissal with liberty to refile aligns with legal procedure.

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.K.SANDESH RAJA

Table of Content
1. writ petition filed under constitutional provision. (Para 1)
2. petitioner requests withdrawal due to defects. (Para 2)

JUDGMENT

This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India .

2. When the writ petition is taken up for consideration today, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition, with the liberty to file a fresh one, due to formal defects.

The liberty sought for is granted. The writ petition accordingly stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh one.

Sd/-

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top