Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
HASEEM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the petitioner is the fourth accused in a criminal case and seeks modification of bail conditions. (Para 1) |
| 2. the necessity of hearing the petitioner and the public prosecutor on bail conditions. (Para 2) |
| 3. the court recognized onerous bail conditions are unconstitutional under article 21. (Para 3 , 4) |
ORDER
The petitioner is the 4th accused in S.C.No.1983/2024 on the file of the Court of the Additional Sessions Judge-IV, Thiruvananthapuram, (Trial Court) which has originated from Crime No.556/2011 registered by the Pallickal Police Station, Thiruvananthapuram. By Annexure A order, the Trial Court granted permission to the petitioner to go abroad and exempted his personal appearance subject to five conditions. As per condition No.1; the petitioner is directed to execute a bond for Rs.2,00,000/-, with two solvent sureties, one of whom shall be a near relative and that the sureties should produce their original title deeds to prove their solvency. As per Condition No.5; the petitioner is also directed to deposit Rs.50,000/- as security within a period 15 days. Conditions Nos. 1 and 5 in Annexure A order is onerous and unjustifiable.
Hence, the Crl.M.C.
2. I have hear
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
