IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
G.GIRISH, J
MOHINI SIVAN – Appellant
Versus
SINI THULASI – Respondent
ORDER
This revision is directed against the concurrent findings of conviction and sentence upon the petitioner in connection with the commission of offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act .
2. As per the judgment rendered on 29.07.2015, the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Adoor, convicted the petitioner for the commission of offence under Section 138 of the NI Act and sentenced her to undergo Simple Imprisonment for six months with a direction to pay Rs.1,50,000/- as compensation to the complainant/1st respondent. Though the petitioner challenged the aforesaid verdict in appeal, the learned Additional Sessions Judge II, Pathanamthitta, concurred with the findings of the learned Magistrate and dismissed the appeal confirming the conviction and sentence. Aggrieved by the above concurrent verdicts of the courts below, the petitioner is before this Court with this revision.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the complainant/1st respondent.
4. On going through the impugned judgment as well as the case records, it is seen that there is absolutely no ground to interfere with the concurrent findings of the courts below th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.