Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MR. GOPINATH P., J
M/S. SARASWATHY VIDYA MANDIRAM (EM) – Appellant
Versus
THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES, EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. interest on delayed remittance levied. (Para 1) |
| 2. petitioner seeks installment relief. (Para 2) |
| 3. court allows installments with certain conditions. (Para 3 , 4) |
JUDGMENT
Petitioner has approached this Court being aggrieved by the fact that certain amounts have been levied as interest on delayed remittance of provident fund dues under Section 7Q of the Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’).
2. When this matter is taken up for consideration today, it is the submission of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner is that the petitioner is only seeking some instalments to clear the liability towards interest.
3. Heard the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Provident Fund Organization also.
4. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Provident Fund Department and having regard to the fact that the petitioner is only seeking a limited relief, the writ petition will stand disposed of, permitting the petitioner to clear the liability towards interest, imposed on the petitioner under the provisions of Section 7Q of the Ac
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
