Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
K. NATARAJAN, J
SREEKUMAR.K.N. – Appellant
Versus
THRISSUR CORPORATION – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner filed suit against license fees during lockdown. (Para 1 , 3) |
| 2. counsels argue over necessity of state government in suit. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court reasons out necessity and dismissal of the amendment. (Para 6 , 9) |
| 4. final decision to dismiss the petition. (Para 10) |
JUDGMENT
(Dated this the 6th day of January, 2026)
This original petition is filed by the petitioner/plaintiff by challenging the order dated 03.10.2024 passed on I.A.Nos.4 & 5/2024 in OS No.610/2022 by the II Additional Munsiff Court, Thrissur.
2. Heard the arguments of the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents.
3. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner filed a Suit against the respondents 1 & 2 for permanent prohibitory injunction, for issuing notice for collecting the licence fee during the Covid -19 lock down period. When the matter was pending before the trial Court, the plaintiff filed applications, IA Nos.4 & 5/2024, seeking amendment to the plaint as well as impleading the State Government as 3rd defendant in the Suit. The applications came to be dismissed by the trial Court on 03.10.2024. Hence, the petitioner is before this Court.
4. The
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
