SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 644

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
ARJUNKRISHNA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
BAIL APPL. NO. 14671 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Shri.Manumon A., Shri.Rebin Vincent Gralan, Shri.Suresh C., Smt.Edathara Vineeta Krishnan, Shri.Santhosh.T.P, Smt.Rosna M. Joy, Smt.Gayathri E.S., Shri.Avin Krishna M.P., Smt.Athira Suresh, Shri.John Christo T.P., Shri.Akshay Kumar C.S., Smt.Liniya Loveson, Smt.Anjali N.S., Sri.Jayan Kuttichakku
For the Respondents: Sri. M.C. Ashi-Sr..PP

Bail granted despite serious charges as ongoing investigation shows no strong evidence against applicant.

Headnote:This application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking bail. The accused is charged under Section 5 of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908, and Sections 9

(B)(1)(b) of the Indian Explosives Act, 1884. The prosecution claims explosives were stored illegally at a quarry. The applicant claims innocence, stating no evidence links him to the crime, with two co-accused already obtaining bail. The court finds the investigation nearly complete and decides bail is justified, highlighting the absence of criminal history. Conditions upon bail emphasize cooperation and witness integrity. Resultantly, bail is granted.

Table of Content
1. application for bail under explosive-related charges. (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments presented by both parties regarding the bail. (Para 4 , 5)
3. court's conclusion allowing bail with conditions. (Para 6)

ORDER

This application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 (for short, BNSS ), seeking regular bail.

2. The applicant is the accused No.1 in Crime No.898/2025 of Walayar Police Station, Palakkad District. The offences alleged are punishable under Section 5 of the Explosive Substances Act , 1908 and Sections 9(B)(1)(b) of the Indian Explosives Act , 1884 (Amendment 2013 & 2014).

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that on

15.11.2025 at 14.30 hours, during patrol duty, police found five tipper lorries parked near a quarry in the coconut grove of one Chinnaswamy in Poolampara. Inside the quarry, two tractors and three excavators were operating. On inspecting the adjacent shed, officers recovered 3,503 gelatin sticks, 1,265 detonators, a battery, wire and a plastic sack used for operating them. As these explosive substances were stored illegally without any licence or permit, the accused are alleged to have knowingly kept them in their possession for use in the quarry and thereby committed the offences.

4. I have heard Sri. Manumon A., the learned counsel for the applicant and Sri. M.C. Ashi, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary.

5. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The counsel further submitted that no materials are on record to connect the applicant with the alleged crime; hence, he is entitled to bail. On the other hand, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor submitted that the alleged incident occurred as a part of the intentional criminal acts of the applicant, and he is not entitled to bail at this stage.

6. The applicant was remanded to judicial custody on 15.11.2025. The investigation is almost over. The applicant is only an accountant of the establishment where the explosives were found. The accused Nos. 2 and 3 who are the owners of the establishment have already been granted bail by this Court. The applicant does not have any criminal antecedents. For these reasons, I do not find any reason to hold that the continued detention of the applicant is required for any purpose. Hence, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.

In the result, the application is allowed on the following conditions: -

(i) The applicant shall be released on bail on executing a bond for ₹1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh only) with two solvent sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional Magistrate/Court.

(ii) The applicant shall fully co-operate with the investigation.

(iii) The applicant shall appear before the investigating officer between 10.00 a.m and 11.00 a.m. every Saturday until further orders. He shall also appear before the investigating officer as and when required.

(iv) The applicant shall not commit any offence of a like nature while on bail.

(v) The applicant shall not attempt to contact any of the prosecution witnesses, directly or through any other person, or in any other way try to tamper with the evidence or influence any witnesses or other persons related to the investigation.

(vi) The applicant shall not leave the State of Kerala without the permission of the trial Court.

(vii) The application, if any, for deletion/modification of the bail conditions or cancellation of bail on the grounds of violating the bail conditions shall be filed at the jurisdictional court. Sd/-

DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH JUDGE kp APPENDIX OF BAIL APPL. NO. 14671 OF 2025 PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure A1 A COPY OF FIR IN CRIME NO. 898 OF 2025 DATED 16.11.2025 OF WALAYAR PS, PALAKKAD Annexure A2 A TRUE COPY OF REMAND REPORT DATED

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top