O R D E R

(Dated this the 08th day of January, 2026)

The petitioner is the accused in SC No. 220 of 2025 on the file of the Special Court for SC/ST(POA) Act, 1969 filed this petition with the prayer to direct the 2^nd respondent to produce the CDRs and tower locations of himself and that of the defacto complainant namely Cws 1 to 3. However, when the matter came up for arguments, the learned Counsel limited his prayer to retaining the call details of the petitioner. The learned Counsel for the 2^nd respondent/ service provider submitted that as per the information received, no such request was received from the investigating officer. On the other hand, the learned Public Prosecutor submits that the information received from the SHO is that request was already given to the

2^nd respondent.

2. In the above circumstances, there will be a direction to the 2^nd respondent to preserve the CDR in respect of the petitioner for the period from 01.04.2024 to 10.09.2024 until further orders. In case the investigating officer or the petitione