2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 698
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN, J
RAJILA BEEVI – Appellant
Versus
RAHILA – Respondent
RFA NO. 465 OF 2019
Important Points
Subject
Civil - Appeal
Act Referred
Headnote
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.M.M.SAIDU MUHAMMED, SHRI.NIZAR .A.
For the Respondents: SRI.M.R.SASITH
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. settled matter allows for appeal withdrawal. (Para 1) |
| 2. court dismisses appeal due to settlement. (Para 2) |
JUDGMENT
It is submitted by the counsel on both sides that the matter is settled out of court between the parties by recourse to Section 89 of the Code of Civil Procedure , 1908. In terms of clause (iv) of Annexure- A1 memorandum of agreement entered into between the parties in E.P.No.43/2019 in O.S.No.53/2011 on the files of the Sub Court, Attingal, the appellant seeks permission to withdraw this appeal.
2. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Since the matter has been settled out of court, the appellant will be entitled for refund of the court fee paid. The Registry may refund the same on usual terms.
Sd/-