Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 708

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
T.R. RAVI, J
ANILA P.R. – Appellant
Versus
ETL CORPORATE SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED – Respondent
OP(C) NO. 2522 OF 2025

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: RONY AUGUSTINE
For the Respondents: NIDHI SAM JOHNS, LIJO JOSEPH, A.KEVIN THOMAS, CELIA SANTHOSH

The court affirmed the right to withdraw an original petition, leading to its dismissal.

Headnote:This judgment relates to OP

(C) No. 2522 of 2025 concerning an application for withdrawal of an original petition. The Counsel for the petitioners duly sought permission to withdraw, and the Court granted the request, leading to the dismissal of the original petition as withdrawn. The findings confirm the Court's approval of withdrawal as a legitimate action under procedural guidelines.

JUDGMENT

Counsel for the petitioners sought permission to withdraw the original petition. A memo has also been filed to that effect.

Permission granted and the original petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 708

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMT.R. RAVI, JANILA P.R. – AppellantVersusETL CORPORATE SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED – RespondentOP(C) NO. 2522 OF 2025

The court affirmed the right to withdraw an original petition, leading to its dismissal.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
T.R. RAVI, J
ANILA P.R. – Appellant
Versus
ETL CORPORATE SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED – Respondent
OP(C) NO. 2522 OF 2025