Back
Next 
2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 708
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
T.R. RAVI, J
ANILA P.R. – Appellant
Versus
ETL CORPORATE SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED – Respondent
OP(C) NO. 2522 OF 2025
Important Points
The court affirmed the right to withdraw an original petition, leading to its dismissal.
Subject
Civil Law - PROCEDURAL
Headnote
This judgment relates to OP
(C) No. 2522 of 2025 concerning an application for withdrawal of an original petition. The Counsel for the petitioners duly sought permission to withdraw, and the Court granted the request, leading to the dismissal of the original petition as withdrawn. The findings confirm the Court's approval of withdrawal as a legitimate action under procedural guidelines.
(C) No. 2522 of 2025 concerning an application for withdrawal of an original petition. The Counsel for the petitioners duly sought permission to withdraw, and the Court granted the request, leading to the dismissal of the original petition as withdrawn. The findings confirm the Court's approval of withdrawal as a legitimate action under procedural guidelines.
Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: RONY AUGUSTINE
For the Respondents: NIDHI SAM JOHNS, LIJO JOSEPH, A.KEVIN THOMAS, CELIA SANTHOSH
For the Appellants/Petitioners: RONY AUGUSTINE
For the Respondents: NIDHI SAM JOHNS, LIJO JOSEPH, A.KEVIN THOMAS, CELIA SANTHOSH
JUDGMENT
Counsel for the petitioners sought permission to withdraw the original petition. A memo has also been filed to that effect.
Permission granted and the original petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/-
