IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
ROPHTI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. accused charged with public disorder-related crimes (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. court allows bail due to lack of evidence for detention (Para 4 , 6) |
O R D E R
This application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 (for short, BNSS )
seeking regular bail.
2. The applicants are the accused Nos.11, 12 and 13 in Crime No.912/2025 of Vellikulangara Police Station, Thrissur District. The offences alleged are punishable under Sections 189 (2), 191(2), 332(c), 132, 324(5), 351, 190 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita , 2023 and Section 3 (1) of the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act , 1984.
3. The prosecution case, in short, is that accused persons, on 08.12.2025 at about 9:00 a.m., due to the fact that a person died due to the attack of the elephant in the locality entered into the Chaippankuzhy Forest Office and destroyed the wireless set, LED etc., caused destruction and thereby committed the offences.
4. I have heard Sri.Raphael Thekkan, the learned counsel for the applicants and Smt.M.K.Pushpalatha, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary. 5. The learned counsel for the applicants submitted that the applicants are inn
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.