Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 876

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
T.R.RAVI, J
MOHAMMED RIYAS – Appellant
Versus
MABEN NIDHI LTD. – Respondent
OP(C) NO. 3060 OF 2025

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SMT.M.A.JINSA MOL
For the Respondents: SRI.SHIJU VARGHESE, SRI.T.M.MANU, SMT.ANAINA VARGHESE

Failure to comply with court orders leads to dismissal of the petition.

Headnote:In this case concerning OP

(C) No. 3060 of 2025, the petitioner, Mohammed Riyas, had failed to comply with a previous court order requiring a deposit of Rs. 2,00,000. The court found that based on this failure, no further orders could be granted. Therefore, the original petition was dismissed.

JUDGMENT

When the case is taken up today, it is submitted that the petitioner has not complied with the direction issued on 28.11.2025 to deposit a sum of Rs.2,00,000/-. No further orders can be granted in this original petition.

The original petition is dismissed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 876

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMT.R.RAVI, JMOHAMMED RIYAS – AppellantVersusMABEN NIDHI LTD. – RespondentOP(C) NO. 3060 OF 2025

Failure to comply with court orders leads to dismissal of the petition.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
T.R.RAVI, J
MOHAMMED RIYAS – Appellant
Versus
MABEN NIDHI LTD. – Respondent
OP(C) NO. 3060 OF 2025