Back
Next 
2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 880
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
MAYA T – Appellant
Versus
THE TRIBUNAL FOR LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT INSTITUTION – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 1670 OF 2020 | WP(C) NO. 22194 OF 2021
Important Points
The court allowed withdrawal of petitions due to settlement between parties, dismissing them accordingly.
Subject
Civil Rights - Writ Petition
Headnote
In the instant writ petitions, the court addressed issues surrounding the settlement between the parties. It was found that there were no remaining issues for adjudication, leading the court to grant permission for withdrawal of the petitions. The primary questions framed included the necessity for continued litigation. The court reasoned that permittance for withdrawal was appropriate, resulting in the dismissal of the writ petitions as withdrawn.
Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.K.MOHANAKANNAN, SMT.A.R.PRAVITHA, SMT.THUSHARA D.S., SRI.H.PRAVEEN (KOTTARAKARA), SHRI.T.S.NEJIMUDDIN, SMT.T.V.NEEMA
For the Respondents: SRI.VINOD SINGH CHERIYAN, SRI.K.M.FIROZ, SRI.T.M.KHALID, SRI.M.MUHAMMED FIRDOUSE, SMT.M.SHAJNA, SMT.K.P.SUSMITHA
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.K.MOHANAKANNAN, SMT.A.R.PRAVITHA, SMT.THUSHARA D.S., SRI.H.PRAVEEN (KOTTARAKARA), SHRI.T.S.NEJIMUDDIN, SMT.T.V.NEEMA
For the Respondents: SRI.VINOD SINGH CHERIYAN, SRI.K.M.FIROZ, SRI.T.M.KHALID, SRI.M.MUHAMMED FIRDOUSE, SMT.M.SHAJNA, SMT.K.P.SUSMITHA
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the petitioners in both cases submits that since the matter is settled between the parties and nothing survives in these writ petitions, permission may be granted to withdraw these writ petitions.
Permission granted and the writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/-
