SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 880

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
MAYA T – Appellant
Versus
THE TRIBUNAL FOR LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT INSTITUTION – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 1670 OF 2020 | WP(C) NO. 22194 OF 2021



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.K.MOHANAKANNAN, SMT.A.R.PRAVITHA, SMT.THUSHARA D.S., SRI.H.PRAVEEN (KOTTARAKARA), SHRI.T.S.NEJIMUDDIN, SMT.T.V.NEEMA
For the Respondents: SRI.VINOD SINGH CHERIYAN, SRI.K.M.FIROZ, SRI.T.M.KHALID, SRI.M.MUHAMMED FIRDOUSE, SMT.M.SHAJNA, SMT.K.P.SUSMITHA

The court allowed withdrawal of petitions due to settlement between parties, dismissing them accordingly.

Headnote:In the instant writ petitions, the court addressed issues surrounding the settlement between the parties. It was found that there were no remaining issues for adjudication, leading the court to grant permission for withdrawal of the petitions. The primary questions framed included the necessity for continued litigation. The court reasoned that permittance for withdrawal was appropriate, resulting in the dismissal of the writ petitions as withdrawn.

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioners in both cases submits that since the matter is settled between the parties and nothing survives in these writ petitions, permission may be granted to withdraw these writ petitions.

Permission granted and the writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top