SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 880

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
MAYA T – Appellant
Versus
THE TRIBUNAL FOR LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT INSTITUTION – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.K.MOHANAKANNAN, SMT.A.R.PRAVITHA, SMT.THUSHARA D.S., SRI.H.PRAVEEN (KOTTARAKARA), SHRI.T.S.NEJIMUDDIN, SMT.T.V.NEEMA
For the Respondents: SRI.VINOD SINGH CHERIYAN, SRI.K.M.FIROZ, SRI.T.M.KHALID, SRI.M.MUHAMMED FIRDOUSE, SMT.M.SHAJNA, SMT.K.P.SUSMITHA

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioners in both cases submits that since the matter is settled between the parties and nothing survives in these writ petitions, permission may be granted to withdraw these writ petitions.

Permission granted and the writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top