2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 935
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
LINDA ACHAMMA ABRAHAM – Appellant
Versus
REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 47348 OF 2025
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.M.R.DHANIL, SMT.SENITTA P. JOJO
For the Respondents: GP, SMT DEEPA V
The court can mandate timely consideration of statutory applications by administrative bodies.
Headnote:The petitioner seeks directions regarding the consideration of the Form 5 applications (Exhibits P3 and P4) by the respondents. The court determined to direct the respondents to submit necessary reports and to expedite consideration of these applications within fixed timeframes. The key issues framed pertain to timely administrative processes. The outcome mandates compliance with specified timelines for actions based on the submitted applications.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks administrative relief regarding application processing. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court acknowledges the request for timely consideration. (Para 3) |
| 3. court issues directives for compliance with timelines. (Para 4) |
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed seeking the following reliefs:
“i) Direct the 1st respondent to consider Exhibits P3 and P4 Form 5 applications filed by the petitioner within a time limit fixed by this Hon’ble Court.
ii) Grant such other reliefs as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper by considering the facts and circumstances of the above case.
iii) Dispense with production of English translation of the documents” [SIC]
2. When this Writ Petition came up for consideration, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner will be satisfied if a direction is issued to consider Exts. P3 and P4 Form–5 applications within a time frame.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.
4. After hearing both sides, I think there can be a direction to consider Exts.P3 and P4 within a time frame.
Therefore, this Writ Petition is disposed of in the following manner:
1. The 5th respondent is directed to submit the necessary report based on Exts.P3 and P4 Form-5 applications to the 1st respondent / Authorised Officer, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.
2. The 1st respondent / Authorised O directed to consider Exts.P3 and P4 Form-5 applications (if it is pending and if it is in order) based on the report received from the 5th respondent, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of four months from the date of receipt of the report.
3. The petitioner will produce a certified copy of this judgment, along with a copy of this Writ Petition with exhibits, before the 1st and 5th respondents for compliance.
Sd/-
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, JUDGE nvj
APPENDIX OF WP(C) NO. 47348 OF 2025 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE BASIC TAX RECEIPT DATED 23/02/2025 OF KAKKANAD VILLAGE Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE BASIC TAX RECEIPT DATED 24/02/2025 OF KAKKANAD VILLAGE Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE FORM 5 APPLICATION AND ITS RECEIPT DATED 15/12/2025 Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE FORM 5 APPLICATION AND ITS RECEIPT DATED 15/12/2025 RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS : NIL //TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE
Judgment reserved
NA
Date of judgment
09.01.2026
Judgment dictated
09.01.2026
Draft Judgment Placed
12.01.2026
Final Judgment Uploaded
13 .01.2026