Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
HRITVIK R – Appellant
Versus
TRAFFIC REGULATORY COMMITTEE – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. filing of the writ petition with specific prayers. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court's prior order and its implications. (Para 3) |
| 3. petitioner's contention against the regulatory decision. (Para 4) |
JUDGMENT
The above Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:
" i) Call for the records pertaining to Ext.P6 and quash the same by issue of a writ of certiorari or any other writ, order or direction;
ii) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the 1st respondent to convene a meeting afresh and re-consider the complaint filed by the 1st petitioner in accordance with law;
iii) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the official respondents to remove and prevent unauthorized parking/auto stand on the public road abutting the petitioners’ residential and commercial property;
iv) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the official respondents to ensure that no auto- rickshaw stand or unauthorized parking is permitted or allowed to be re-established in front of the petitioners’ property in future, and to take effective enforcement action for the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
