IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
JIJO THOMAS – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The above Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:
"(i) Issue a writ of Mandamus directing the respondents No.1 to 4 to consider Ext.P7 Complaint and see that the 7th respondent is not running crusher unit in any unauthorized buildings and without obtaining valid Establishment permit under Section 233 of the Kerala Panchayathraj Act and building permit and occupancy certificate of hazardous buildings under Karala Panchayth Building Rules, within the 1st respondent Gramapanchayath, in the interest of justice.
(ii) Issue a writ of Mandamus directing the respondent No.6 to consider Ext.P8 Complaint and pass orders taking note of Ext.P6 sitting criteria, after giving chance of being heard to the petitioner immediately, within the time limit fixed by this honorable court, in the interest of justice."
[SIC]
2. Petitioner is aggrieved mainly because the 7th respondent is running a metal crusher unit in an unauthorised building without obtaining valid permits and license. This Court directed the Panchayat to get instructions. A counter-affidavit is filed by the 4th respondent. It will be better to extract the relevant portion of the counter affidavit.
" 5. It is most re
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.