SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 1062

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
SWAMINATHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 23 OF 2026 | S.C.NO.1058 OF 2019



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.M.VIVEK
For the Respondents: SR.PP-SRI.A.VIPIN NARAYAN

The court upheld the need for further examination of evidence under Section 311 Cr.P.C to ensure proper understanding of the victim's evidence.

Headnote:The petition pertains to a Criminal Miscellaneous Case involving the accused's challenge of an order permitting the prosecution to examine additional witnesses on a disability certificate. The court found no error in the lower court's order within the context of the victim's mental condition and necessity for evidencing the certificate. The legal issues centered around the examination of additional evidence under Section 311 Cr.P.C. The conclusion was that dismissal of the Crl.M.C was warranted due to lack of merit.

SWAMINATHAN vs STATE OF KERALA - 2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 1062
Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top