Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
SAJITH.P – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court connects the bail applications over alleged financial fraud. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. court highlights the accused's supervisory role and allegations of misconduct. (Para 4) |
| 3. court discusses the insufficiency of evidence for continued detention. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. court issues bail with specific conditions due to lack of justification for detention. (Para 8) |
ORDER
[Bail Appl. Nos.12/2026, 13/2026, 14/2026, 19/2026, 30/2026, 31/2026, 32/2026, 33/2026, 35/2026, 36/2026, 37/2026, 38/2026 and 40/2026]
All the above bail applications are connected and hence I am disposing of the same by a common order.
2. The above bail applications are filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, BNSS ), seeking regular bail.
3. The applicant is same in all these bail applications.
The offences involved in all the crimes are punishable under Sections 336 (3), 340(2), 318(4), 316(2), 316(5) and 338 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 20023 (for short, BNS )
4. B.A.No.12 of 2026 pertains to Crime No.1193/2025, B.A.No.13 of 2026 pertains to Crime No.1194/2025, B.A.No.14 of 2026 pertains to Crime No.1196/2025, B.A.No.19 of 2026 pertains to Crime No.1224/2
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
