Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
BASIL RAHMAN R.N. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. accused charged under ipc for cruelty. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. parties settled disputes through mediation. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court endorsed settlement via mediation. (Para 5) |
| 4. proceedings quashed based on settlement. (Para 6) |
O R D E R
(Dated this the 14th day of January, 2026)
The petitioner is the sole accused in CC No.568 of 2024 of Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-I, Karunagappally, arising out of Crime No.487 of 2024 of Karunagapally Police Station. The offences alleged against the petitioner is under Sections 498A and 323 of IPC .
2. The prosecution case is that the accused, who is the husband of the de facto complainant, subjected her to cruelty both physically and mentally, voluntarily caused hurt to her and thereby, he is alleged to have committed the aforesaid offences.
3. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the entire disputes between the petitioner and the de facto complainant were settled. Therefore he prayed for quashing all further proceedings against the petitioner.
4. The learned counsel for the 3rd respondent/de facto complainant also submitted that the entire disputes between the petitioner and the de facto complainant were settled and
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
