Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MR. JOHNSON JOHN, J
AKKU.V.SARANG – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. conviction based on negligent driving. (Para 1 , 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding discrepancies in evidence. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's affirmation of trial court's findings. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. scope of revisional jurisdiction. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 5. final decision to dismiss petition. (Para 10 , 11) |
ORDER
The revision petitioner is the accused in C.C. No. 961 of 2016 of the Judicial First Class Magistrate, Kayamkulam and the appellant in Crl. Appeal 233 of 2019 before the Additional Sessions Judge- III, Mavelikkara. The appellate court confirmed the conviction of the revision petitioner for the offences under Sections 279 and 304(A) IPC and modified the sentence by releasing him on probation of good conduct and keep peace for a period of three years under Section 4 (1) of the Probation of Offenders Act and also to pay compensation of Rs.1,50,000/- under Section 5 of the to the legal representatives of the deceased Vasudevan and PW2.
2. Heard Sri. Arjun R., the learned counsel representing the learned counsel for the revision petitioner on record and Sri. Alex M.
Thombra, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor.
3. The prosecution case is that on 20.03.2016, at about 3 p.m., when the decease
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
