Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V. KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
PN PREMALATHA – Appellant
Versus
KERALA COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. relief sought against administrative order due to lack of hearing. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. observations on the necessity of following procedural fairness. (Para 4) |
| 3. final directions given to reconsider after hearing. (Para 5) |
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed seeking the following reliefs:
“a) Issue a writ of certiorari or other appropriate writ, order or direction to call for the records relating to Exhibit P4 order and set aside the same.
b) To hold that Ext P4 order is against the principle of natural justice and is in willful disregard of Ext P2 Judgment.
c)To hold that the petitioner’s property falls within the CRZ Zone II in terms of Exhibit P3 statement and orders annexed thereto.
d) Issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ, order or direction to reconsider the petitioners application (Ext R8(A) ),in the light of Exhibit P3 by providing the petitioner an opportunity of been heard, in compliance with the judgment in Ext P2.
AND e)To dispense with the production of Malayalam documents.
f) Issue such other writ, order or direction as are deemed just and proper on the facts and circumstances of the case.”
[SIC]
2. The main grievance raised by the petitioner is
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
