Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANIL K.NARENDRAN, MURALEE KRISHNA S., JJ
THE MANAGER, MAR THOMA GIRLS HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, THRISSUR – Appellant
Versus
RINCE P. SEBASTIAN – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. grounds for review under the cpc. (Para 1 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments from both sides concerning the review petition's validity. (Para 2 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's reasoning on exercise of review jurisdiction. (Para 7) |
ORDER
Muralee Krishna, J.
This review petition is filed under Order XLVII Rule 1 read with Section 114 of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908 by the 1st respondent in W.A.No.162 of 2023, seeking review of the judgment dated 09.10.2025, passed by this Court in that writ appeal.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned counsel for the 1st respondent, the learned counsel for the
6th respondent and the learned Senior Government Pleader.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the 5th respondent relinquished the post of Principal and the 6th respondent continues as Principal in charge from 13.11.2021 onwards. The Manager did not disclose the said fact before this Court while filing the appeal. Believing the version of the management, this Court allowed the appeal, declaring the 5th respondent as qualified to become Principal of the Higher Secondary School. Therefore, the judgment was obtained without presenting all the facts. From Ann
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
