Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MR. SATHISH NINAN, MR. P. KRISHNA KUMAR, JJ
MUHAMMAED SHAN – Appellant
Versus
JASMI – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. claim for gold ornaments and maintenance post-marriage. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. court's evaluation of evidence and findings on maintenance. (Para 6 , 7 , 9 , 11 , 13) |
| 3. assessing the credibility of evidence and claims regarding entrustment. (Para 8 , 10 , 12) |
| 4. court confirms trial court’s authority and order on claims. (Para 14 , 15) |
| 5. final orders on maintaining the trial court's decision. (Para 16) |
JUDGMENT
P.Krishna Kumar, J.
The appellant is the respondent in O.P. No. 585/2013 on the file of the Family Court, Attingal. The said petition was filed by his wife seeking recovery of gold ornaments and money and for maintenance. By the impugned judgment, the Family Court partly allowed the petition.
2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are hereinafter referred to as they were arrayed in the original petition. The petitioner and the respondent were married on 26.11.2012. The petitioner alleges that at the time of marriage, her parents gave her 75 sovereigns of gold ornaments and that on the next day, when she went to her matrimonial home, the respondent and his relatives obtained 70 sovereigns of gold from her, representing that the same would be kept in a locker
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
