Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
V.G.ARUN, J
FRANK CHIKENZIE NKACHUKWU – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
Understood. Please provide the legal document within
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's movement restriction under immigration act. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court's observation regarding relevant statutory powers. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. clarification on the bail conditions and representation. (Para 5 , 6) |
The petitioner, a Nigerian national, is the 10, Dated this the 18th day of December, 2025 accused in Crime No.56 of 2025 registered at the Kunnamangalam Police Station for the offence under Section 22(c) read with 29 of the NDPS Act, now pending as S.C.No.212 of 2025 on the files of the Special Court (NDPS Act Cases), Vatakara. The petitioner was granted bail by the Special Court as per Ext.P3 order. Condition No.1 of Ext.P3 requires the petitioner to execute a bond for Rs.1 lakh with two solvent sureties each for the like amount. The order also restrains the petitioner from leaving India till the disposal of the case. The petitioner and sureties executed the bond in accordance with condition No.1, as evidenced by Ext.P4 dated 18.10.2025. On the same day, the Foreigners Regional Registration Officer/2nd respondent issued Ext.P5 order imposing restriction on the petitioner's movement and confining him to the transit home at Kottiyam in Kollam Dist
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
