SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 1612

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
K. BABU, J
DR DEEPAK NAIR M.V. – Appellant
Versus
SASIREKHA – Respondent
RPFC NO. 150 OF 2023



Important Points

Withdrawal of revision petitions can be permitted and results in dismissal without further findings.

Subject

Family Law - Revision Petitions

Headnote

The court addressed the permission sought by the revision petitioner to withdraw the Revision Petition. The court noted the request and granted the permission to withdraw. Ultimately, the court dismissed the Revision Petition as withdrawn, reflecting no further proceedings or findings were presented by the court.

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.JOHNSON ABRAHAM, SHRI.NELSON ABRAHAM, SHRI.EMIL JOHNSON
For the Respondents: SMT.VALSAMMA KURIAN JOSE

O R D E R

The learned counsel for the revision petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the Revision Petition.

2. The permission sought for is granted.

The Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top