SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 1620

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
T.R.RAVI, J
ROY JOSEPH – Appellant
Versus
JOSE CHACKO – Respondent
OP(C) NO. 1016 OF 2025



Important Points

A party may withdraw a petition at any stage, leading to its dismissal.

Subject

Civil Law - Petition Withdrawal

Headnote

The petitioners sought withdrawal of their original petition. The Court allowed their request, leading to dismissal of the petition as withdrawn. The counsel for the petitioners adequately represented their position, and the Court's order reflects this. Thus, the matter is formally concluded with a dismissal.

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SMT.T.THASMI, SHRI. DILEEP S. KRISHNAPRIYA G., SMT.ATHIRA A.MENON
For the Respondents: SRI.JOJU KYNADY, SHRI.RESHVAN A., SHRI.SAURAV SHAJI

ORDER

The counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the original petition.

Permission granted and the original petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top