Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
K. Natarajan, J
M.G Goplakrishna Kamath – Appellant
Versus
C. Prasad @ Prasath – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition seeks to amend particulars regarding payment. (Para 1 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. court analyzes issues and past case relevance for the amendment. (Para 2 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. parties presented their arguments concerning the amendment. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. previous case laws related to amendments discussed. (Para 7) |
| 5. court allows the amendment application and overrides the lower court's decision. (Para 10 , 12 , 13) |
JUDGMENT This petition filed by the petitioner/plaintiff for setting aside the order passed by the Principal Munsiff’s Court, Kochi, for having dismissed the application filed by the petitioner/plaintiff under Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure , for seeking amendment.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondent.
3. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner being the plaintiff filed a suit for realisation of money as against the defendant for Rs.7,00,000/- with 8% interest per annum. The plaintiff has instructed his counsel to file the suit, but while filing the suit the counsel did some mistakes in the pleading. As the plaintiff has paid Rs.2,00,000/- by way of RTGS through bank and another one lakh was given i
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
