Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
GOPINATH P., J
CHANDRABOSE PK – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. guarantor involved in liability dispute over a loan. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments presented by the 7th respondent society regarding recovery rights. (Para 3) |
| 3. court ruling on liability and process for recovery as a guarantor. (Para 4) |
| 4. final decision permitting proceedings against the guarantor. (Para 5) |
JUDGMENT The petitioner was one of the guarantors to a loan availed by the 8th respondent from the 7th respondent Society. According to the petitioner, the petitioner is presently working as a Sub Inspector of Police while the 8th respondent, who was working as a Civil Police Officer (DVR) in the Motor Transport Office, Ernakulam and retired from service on 31.05.2025.
2. According to the petitioner, the 7th respondent Society is proceeding to recover the liability of the 8th respondent from the salary of the petitioner and the other guarantor, while not attempting to recover the amount from the 8th respondent.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the 7th respondent Society submits that on default being committed by the 8th respondent, proceedings were initiated under Section 69 of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act , 1969 against the petitioner, the other guaran
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
