IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
SATHYABHAMA.M.K. – Appellant
Versus
SHEENA.M.B. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The petitioner has filed the captioned writ petition seeking a direction to the 4th respondent not to grant an NOC for the proposed petroleum retail outlet by the 1st respondent herein.
2. Sri.Jay Mohan, the learned counsel for the petroleum company would point out that an NOC has already been issued as evidenced by Ext.R1(a), as early as on 26.02.2017, even before the presentation of this writ petition.
3. Also heard the learned Government Pleader Sri.B.S.Syamanthak and Sri.A.Arunkumar, the learned counsel for the 6th respondent KSEB.
In view of the issuance of NOC as noticed earlier, I find no merit in this writ petition and the same would stand dismissed.
Sd/-
HARISANKAR V. MENON JUDGE ANA APPENDIX OF WP(C) NO. 17981 OF 2019 PETITIONER EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.