K.P.PRINCY vs THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR (LA) - 2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 1706

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 1706

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
K.P.PRINCY – Appellant
Versus
THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR (LA) – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.BINOY VASUDEVAN, SRI.SREEJITH SREENATH, SMT.RINCY KHADER, SMT.K.V.RAJESWARI, SMT.SUSHAMA DEVI M.
For the Respondents: GP SRI K JANARDHANA SHENOY

Table of Content
1. understanding the facts related to the dismissal of the form-5 application. (Para 1 , 2)
2. the need for a clear directive and fair hearing. (Para 3)
3. the court’s directive for reconsideration is emphasized. (Para 4 , 5)

JUDGMENT

This Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:

" I. Issue a writ of Certiorari or other appropriate writs, orders or directions to call for the records leading upto Exhibit.P11 order and to quash the same;

II. Issue a writ of Mandamus or other appropriate writs, orders or directions, commanding the 1^st respondent to exclude the property from the data bank as expeditiously as possible at any rate within a time frame to be fixed by this Hon’ble Court in the interest of justice."

[SIC]

2. A Form-5 application submitted by the petitioner was originally dismissed, and the same was challenged before this Court, and this Court, as per Ext.P10 judgment, set aside the same and directed the 1^st respondent to reconsider the application. Now, Ext.P11 order is passed again, dismissing the application.

Aggrieved by the same, this Writ Petition is filed.

3. Heard counsel for the petitioner and the Government Pleader.

4. This Court perused Ext.P10

Click Here to Read the rest of this document